Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jody J. Sperling's avatar

I wouldn't add anything to this, and I'm grateful for you adding your flavor the the post. The big transformation I crave for the writing community is to embrace that it is good to write for readers.

From a philosophical perspective, I believe it's impossible to do anything that isn't FOR ourselves. Even Mother Teresa found gratification in her service. But somehow the modern message pushed by the loudest messengers is that it's more art if you don't "think about what readers want to write," and when you don't care about money.

Those behaviors and lies fire me up!

Expand full comment
Corey Smith's avatar

I don't see why you can’t write for both. I might even argue that you should write for yourself and the reader.

If I write only for the reader, I sound flat and lack the vehemence necessary to make the reader—or myself—believe in what I am saying, the story, the characters, the brand and the product.

I write fiction foremost because it allows me to explore human behavior and myself. Not to mention I enjoy well-structured sentences, snappy dialogue and the intricacies of turning phrases. Beyond that, I want to share with the world what I know and what I don't. I want to propose questions not often asked. I want to inspire readers, indulge them, and whirl them through unexpected paroxysms of emotions unfamiliar to them.

None of this is possible—for me—if I don't also write for myself. Everybody's different.

However, writing copy and blogs is a different game. Then I am merely an instrument in connecting people to brands and products, and the most important aspect here is the audience.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts